There was a period, working as a consultant, when I began to doubt my own ability at the root.
In a project room, people a rank or two above are talking. I follow the content. I follow the context. And then I notice that I am the only one who has said nothing. Try to speak and there is no opening. Speak, and the conversation has already moved on.
“Is there something fundamental that I am missing?”
That thought accumulated slowly, and steadily.
The blank space that rank difference creates
In an organisation like a Big Four firm, communication across ranks carries a particular asymmetry.
People at the senior ranks have spent years acquiring the art of omission. They do not state premises. They do not explain background. The more important the point, the more lightly it is dropped. Within the organisation that settles naturally into being how a capable person speaks.
The junior, meanwhile, has to listen while filling in those omissions in real time. While you are keeping up, there is no problem. Slip even slightly and you are choosing between pretending to understand and saying nothing.
Many times, I chose the second.
For a long while I read that silence as evidence of my own low ability. It was not. It was a blank space produced by a difference in experience, not a limit on my intelligence. At the time I could not tell those two apart.
What the loss of confidence really was: a faulty comparison
One day something became clear to me.
The instant judgement and intuitive remarks I thought I was bad at were the output of pattern recognition those senior people had built up over years. They were not geniuses; they had been through the same context several hundred times. That is why it looked fast.
I was comparing myself as I was to them ten years on, and feeling inferior. It was the least fair comparison available.
When people lose confidence, they very often measure themselves as they are now against someone else’s finished form. That comparison is structurally unequal, and you lose it every time.
Not blaming yourself is not the same as giving up
The way I recovered was nothing special.
I changed the axis of comparison. Instead of other people’s present, I compared against my own past. And then, slowly but unmistakably, I could see that I was moving forward.
And I stopped being ashamed of the silence — because I realised that pretending to understand what you do not makes you smaller than your actual ability does.
“Do not blame yourself” does not mean stop working. It means protect yourself from unfair comparison. Once I could hold that distinction, the way I faced the work changed, quietly.
What I would say now to the person I was then
In that meeting room, silent, I was not producing nothing. I was listening, thinking, digesting. That became the foundation of whatever ability came later.
Being quiet is not the same as being empty.
On the other half of that lesson — what those consulting skills did and did not transfer to when I went independent — see you can build the box, but not the contents.
Comments